In the moment: de-escalate, don't push through
If tone is rising or the employee becomes visibly distressed or defensive, it's usually better to acknowledge that and offer a short break or reschedule than to push through to a conclusion. Trying to 'finish' a review while someone is upset rarely produces an outcome either side actually stands by afterwards.
Write your account of the meeting immediately
As soon as possible after the meeting — ideally the same day — write down what was said, by whom, and what (if anything) was agreed. Do this whether or not the meeting went badly; a contemporaneous note is far more credible than a reconstruction weeks later, for both the manager and the employee.
If the employee disputes the record afterwards
Share your written summary and explicitly invite them to say where they disagree, rather than treating your version as final. Record their response alongside yours — 'the employee disagrees that X happened and states Y' is a legitimate and useful thing to have on file. Trying to get the employee to simply sign off on a version they've contested tends to escalate things rather than resolve them.
When to bring in HR or a neutral third party
Bring HR in when: the disagreement is about facts that matter for a formal process (a PIP, a disciplinary outcome), the relationship between manager and employee has clearly deteriorated, or either party raises a grievance. A neutral third party — internal HR, or external mediation — can help both sides get back to a working conversation, which a manager who's already part of the disagreement often can't do alone.
Consider structured mediation for a genuinely stuck relationship
If the underlying problem is really the working relationship rather than a specific factual dispute — repeated friction, breakdown in trust, communication that keeps going wrong — a single follow-up meeting often just repeats the same pattern. A structured, confidential mediation process, with a neutral facilitator and a written outcome both sides sign off, can get further than another unstructured conversation.
Don't let it drift
The riskiest option is doing nothing — leaving a disputed review unresolved and hoping it settles itself. Unresolved review disputes are a common precursor to grievances and, eventually, tribunal claims, because the underlying issue never actually got addressed, only avoided.
Frequently asked questions
Should I apologise if I mishandled part of the conversation?
If something was genuinely handled badly — an unfair comment, a lack of preparation — acknowledging it plainly is usually the right call and tends to de-escalate rather than weaken your position.
Can the employee refuse to continue the meeting?
Yes, and it's often the right outcome if things have become heated. Reschedule rather than insist, and note that the meeting was paused and why.
Does a disputed review automatically become a grievance?
No — it only becomes a formal grievance if the employee raises one, following your organisation's grievance procedure. Many disputes are resolved informally with a follow-up conversation before it gets there.
This is general guidance on UK workplace practice, not legal advice. If a case is contested, high-risk, or involves discrimination, ill-health or long service, take advice from a solicitor or ACAS before acting.
Next step
When a review relationship is genuinely stuck, GoMediation.ai's mediation rooms give both sides a structured, confidential way to work it through — with a written outcome.
Explore workplace mediation